Thought experiment.

On the suggestion that there are different dimensions of a religion or ideology based on the do amicus [!] ...dynamics of political power, akin to my lemony ship it...*

*links and edits 5-23-16
[!] spell check LOL
(do amicus: auto fill)
[and labels]
[This originated from a comment that there are different "levels" of Islam. Well... there are certainly different perspectives on Christianity.  Do they really depend on whether they are in the majority politically?  This might open up an whole new bailiwick.  ( !?! Sanders and Trump "followers" and the rules.) ] 

Separate thought or tangent:  $13.50 Too muddle against the means.

5-28-16
Jennifer Rubin: Raw Story on Clinton Republicans
Michael Bourne: Salon on Bernie as Clinton VP
David Sloan Wilson: Evonomics on Corporate Evolutionism
Anne Gearan: (RSN) Washington Post on Sanders DNC platform (Cornel West)committer persons.

5-30-16
Perspective in Progress [ ? ]  (/)

Incomplete Geometry

In the process of investigating the genome piece there was a podcast of it which included a prior segment.

[Very Rough Thinking In Progress]

In a bit of preemptive* positing, I note the potential significance of 8 and 24 dimension.

Could it be that it is related to the fact that 2 cubed is eight and 8x3 is 24. 

I say that without quibbling** over the definition of dimensions, but to say they are using it too purely mathematical. 

But now that I have spelled it out, might it represent 3 dimensions in each of the 8 quadrants of standard x-y-z grid.  Or am I just putting into words what it actually means in their math?

* having listened to the podcast but not done the math
** @ t we already have a different definition or do we?  (x,y,z, & t)
then there are the dimentions[!] of Arthur Young, and by golly was that 8 or v/7?***
[!]= irony or (sic) that I found him with that spelling

Filing purposes:
Or round file of clean desktop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion


https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160421-the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160330-sphere-packing-solved-in-higher-dimensions/


*** I was not aware of Young when I developed my own tetrahedron
(I credit a parsing of Einstein and a recreation of The Republic for my structure.)

BTW:
What is living?

5-4-16 
May the Fourth be with you!
Quantum Bookmarks:  3:40, 5:16, 5:4, 6:50, ...

5-5-16  OW / VP  (need more labels)

Below the Fold[!]

What if?

To pun on lede or ship we are on [!]*
C-labels or Art Young.
Ctrl F perspectivism, dimentionalism, Al Gore Rhythms.
(PR: preemptive reads?)
"due the math"

*spoiler alert[last 4 inserts]

Literally...

{Kruger Leap?  Inversal Pictures[!]}1-23-16

Parallel...

tangents and leverage ?

Not to mention un-M~bed labels.

1. Darwin's God
2. wikipedia
3. The fourth dimension.
4. MockOp-
a., b., c.

[M H-P]
1b. Phone Home [!]

Counter Intelligence

Not really ... or type-O ?

Before I cast aspersions we might be reminded of curve ball and other manipulations for political gain or loss. 

People can be told anything, confirming it or counting on it are another thing, not to mention protecting sources**, let alone foreign and domestic consumption of intelligence. 

5-15-15 Dimentions(~)* of Speculation
QCON, NFRY, NFR, and a number more labels. 
Quick Comment on News
Not Fully Read Yet
Not Fully Read
# more?

*or labels or magnitudes of exposure to "intelligence community"
(~) alternate sarcasm punctuation or (sic) for spelling intended
** not to advocate misleading but international relations, national security and truth as the first casualty of war and Clause~wits are a factor in considering sources.

Priority of Read is another asterisk(or read through the nuance).
Charles Pierce(really) reviews Seymor Hersh's (or) while Huffington(I) reviews the New York Times aspersions and Bergen's(cast)  is unembedded from Charles Pierce's piece.

The Meme Police

Don't Sell Me Bro'?
NOW w/Alex Wagner
Cheap Trick?
Rand Report? 

Not Exactly A venn or label* under construction. 
My infrastructure may be folding. 


* 5-14-15 No labels or links had been inserted till today. 
Inserted in this order:
Rand Report Cheap Trick Not Excactly Venn Label  (^)

Click watch video MSNBC fail?  Right Watch Click
Bane or Share?  OK, it must be me or my computer.
Links are not connecting, such as I would like them to MSNBC.  

(^) Venn Labels unbolded tangents.

Y. F'N 3, Work in Progress, Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?
Z. The Meme Police , Rat Races Van Mices? , Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*? , Rough Philosophy

5-5-15
Meme Rand yet to link successfully

There was the 3 AM call...

Now there is the Wednesday Morning Quarterbacking or Afternoon Running Back Fake*.
Not to men~shun Re-labels.
All In?

The nexus is the legacy of progress**.  Now that may seem too muddled to be clear, but it takes a table.  It takes three branches of government and lede~or~ship.  The legislation in Indiana, the TPP, and the Iran negotiations, spin on the interpretation of rules and who writes them.  The spinning will continue.   

* technical difficulties^ with MSNBC links(hopefully temporary)
Indiana object lesson for America
Subject Lesson?  Lesson

^ Indiana GOP changes language in religious freedom law
** links dropped

Obama With Drama

For complete context I will have to read further.

For preemptive context^, is it between the Frost and the Peck?

Recent references?^^
Poetic linkage?

(^) F P
(^^) R. Throwing the Game  / r. Net and Yahoo? , WWW Wisconsin Lesson?





The WhoSure State?

See labels. *











* looking deeper into the quagmire

Re:4th mat ?

[Meanwhile, still digging.  Where did I bury that poetic link?  It may have only been under the italics 2 back.]

AnyHow ... apparently I buried or wove under the nexus** of a brighter side of life.  I must return later to the [...] *** junction?

** bane oar tangent

*** 3-24-15 kantinued post red[!]
Translation: did read.
Path/Road~Frost/Peck to be sorted under Fed oration[!] 
Vulcan/English~Table/Borg \~\
Spock/Nimoy~Idle/Palin Galactic Conference?
Let alone . . . ??[!]

Bin(un)Jun'Go

2 links
in progress.
Steve Smith (watching)in progress. [('n Strauss)!]

Previous reference and reL8ted viewings.

i.p. Fukuyama/Kaplan...

(ReLabelism)
[/] 1. (FP!) , 2. Proof of Life... 3. The Hope
i.p.  1.  ★Re-initialism★ , 2. Mises... , 3. Cultural Threads are Fine. 4.  Neo-Context

March Forth ?  [Lost in the Phrey?]

3-5-15: 1st things (above 'n labels!). 
Lede or Ship? [C-font!] (intro/content/) (heading/goal?)
Bin- parsing of bingo and un-circular file / (un)~Jung or circular / Go~Hegelian [!]
Line 3 some articles and links re: Steve Smith (Straussian?)
L4: PR& Strauss Lectures.

Note: It may not be obvious, but I don't always get back to read everything labeled NFRY or NFR.
While NFR may mean not necessarily needing to, NFRY indicates a hope to.  Then
fortuitus $hits happen.  Like the opening of the last link(LM frying pan), and the parsing of 4-2-it-us?  Not to men shun(A2~?)   [ahhhh! ???] Let alone one liners.*

Now to the^^ point at the mo'ment.  Acon Ference? **

*(FPip)(???)~ The Un-Revolved(~) Thread / (ahhh)~ commercial goat scream / (?)~Jenga / (A2)~et tu / (shun) USCroll click / (men)~[lost or redone'dented] / (to)~Jung& / GnotS

** a file of sorts un red[!]or yetT for 2? (Or tent4text) /~gno-M~BA
Loose unMbeds? O'w[!]? ^
^D'Ribble saved in draft
^^ 2B read and viewed
[ final note !: that's the ticket ? ] ( fp: Still in draft? ) [knot necessarily gunuh]
fur cation?




Saux?(~\~) ow~/~ew what?



That's what!

Bane or Book

Many Republican candidates have book deals in this race.
Here Boehner shows his true colors and we can throw the book at him.
He is known for his tan or orange tint, while No Labels or Bridge candidates range purple. 
But on The Ed Show  this afternoon we can throw the purple at him.
Batter bather that's anarchist folks[!]

[tangent]
(Rubio, MM)

Misplaced Postings

Center for American Progress

OurFuture...dot orgs

slash labels.

NEO?

Not exactly original ? [!] *

Note acronymbal labels [?]

* for reference

Parsing Systems

P.S.  Are we Charlie?  Or why aren't we French? 
It is a shame that fame comes under such horrible circumstances.

Not to bury the lede in nuance or labels, but I intend to more heavily edit** insertion of links for the time being.  Unfortunately I may have now buried more nonsense*.  I am not Forbes, The Atlantic or Slate.  Not that I have placed then in any order of sense.  My point was to review any prior use elsewhere that I have yet to place in context~. 

*not that I have parsed the nonsense, be it the Daily Caller, the New York Times, David Brooks or any of their words.

** carefully filter

*~* I am not a Paper Bird! 
Je ne pax The String! 
Nor Car Tunist. 
R we all sat-irists?

RFD? ?[?]  Not to withdraw weapons.



1-13-15 The vig ? ** not fully read IRONY!

I am not Forbes ~!~  Context:  This is a difficult read.  Is it really necessary to disseminate examples to determine that the killings are not justified? Maybe we are more French than we might like[!]  Further context:  Images and cartoons in reaction to the massacre are not comparable to the images or cartoons that Charlie Hebdo publishes.  Not that I have avoided either, I just wished to review my m-beds.  i.e. links I have yet to parse or deconstruct
 
(Now, Romney? The Reid Report, pre-The Cycle. Un-parsed: -)

Rest In Peace

Resolution In Progress ? 
Rest in Peace !
Resolution in Process ?

(Re:labels.)

AF Wack[!]

Buffalo has wings[!]
They Beet Green Bey!

[ ] = post-timing shun thing/c-labels
! scroll click iE.B.

i.e. bracketed/ post*/scheduled thing

 * (12-15-14)
12-13-14
Pre-Post or Us?  Hawks beat SC[!]

(No post on Saturday the 13th.)
(fp1)
Think Progress Down Under [?]

12-16-14 On 12-13-14, not to do the math or numerology, but there was more football.  The Midshipmen of Annapolis over the Black Knights of Westpoint 17-10 for Navy's 13th straight win.

TGIF (two)

Friday: Labels/ Footnotes, Under Construction*

Thursday: Not Fully Re(!)d Yet
Wednesday: Tuesdays wit'MorE[!]
Tuesday: Reader Supported News, MSNBC,  B.P., Lean Forward File, RYB, Torture Report, J D-B / NewsNation , (FP!), UVC
Monday: Post-Posted
Sunday: Go Birds!
Saturday: AC/DC

Last Friday: TGIF, Breaking Raven Systems 
*heavy M-bed of con tent. 
(type-O search)(fp?) 
(i.e.) there is no lede here in this post: C-con tent.

(fp?): blog search > leed / neither > intended /
found problem: A. Building On Change, B. Speaking of timing, C. Obama Leaks , D. The Real Deal , E. Re: Leads
C C : The Hope /the M-bed/ofor/con**tent
** geometry of purpose (the irony of the leed [!]...or ship)
  

Footnotes Page December 2014 Page Two

12-2-14: (usc) lede or ship >< (regards to scroll/clicks and headings) Sea Labels. (oW) on Will?
(b.s.)reducks(bp) >: A. "no such thing as bad press", B. (FP2@), C. A Fifth, D. Short Cuts, E. Mass Characterization, F. hmmm?, (/) G. Just: a thought., H. Memories...or Excusing Pre-quashing , I. Anachronistic Reasoning? , J. Caging Godzillas , K. QCON: TruthOut , L. Belated Calls and Commemoration? , M. Global Communications, N. HIT AND RUN (QCON)

(/) Running/Drafting Footnotes  (/) (The Reid Report /The Cycle) Holder Cook! Shumer/Howard-16oo. Webb-Huntsman[!] Warren-Carter?

12-4-14: 1. 2. 3. on* Words. (OW) *on/of/or The Inconvenience of Both/And.
12-5-14: (Breaking) TGIF (RFD?)/ Raven System. (uc) / [~week~] Ir(e)ony [?] ofor words[!]
12-8-14 ; fed-upism? Re:fed-upism [!]

Keystone File

Not to necessarily read:


Keystone XL pipeline bill fails in the Senate (Vox),
Mother Jones, Crooks and Liars ?


C-Labels...
[Keystone XL, Filibuster, NFRY]


The point is that it is hard to gauge references to filibusters such as they are engaged these days*. 
*how long and counting ?

[update: When is a thing, not a thing?  When it is constitutional[!]]
[Keystone cops?]

All Flat Statements Are Wrong.

Paradox or naut? 

(fn?) 1. googled phrase in heading
2. facebooked Philosphy Now
3. blogsearched PN
Re:labels

Translation: 3 points determine a plane *
hint/d'ribble: 4d fair lane ?
[two ends against reality?]


tag: all flat statements are wrong
 
* is not a flat statement
3 points are a plane is a flat statement
to determine takes another dimension

A flat statement only has three points in one plane. 
noun + verb ~ has more than three dimensions
noun + verb ~ maybe true (knot?)







FYI: possibly the grand conundrum
A statement of what is flat takes another perspective.
Therefore it is not flat, therefore outside this plane statement.

We R all Right?

Not All Left ? In Sync ?
Roy G Biv?

i.e. We Rn't all left!
~~~~~~~~
Seg Way :
There is a website Stubled Upon.*  (...]**
...Escher, Bach and its subtitle. ala L(...ewis Caroll, Sinclair Lewis, Upton Sinclair.]
Therefore a potential Wit gen Raq i(s Tripped Up On / Tripped A Pawn...}
W G R => labels
** Note(...]} reflect a computer glitch.  GOTO S W
([{ bracketeds are partial recollections and adaptations.Seg Way links then inserted. Not 2 men shun S W links.

*I'm not a member and caution it puts you in a loop that shares your data ala social network
10-14-14[OW]